Contact us
CALL US NOW 1-888-GOLD-160

ESG Collapsing? The Latest on Corporate “Environmental, Social, Governance”

  by    0   4

ESG, or “Environment, Social, and Governance,” is the new feel-good buzzword in the halls of global corporations and megabanks. It’s a PR push to cloak morally disastrous firms in a veneer of social and environmental responsibility — lip service — but at the end of the day, I believe the market will speak. 

If ESG initiatives cause these companies to bleed money, they’ll start pulling back, and that’s exactly what we’re seeing. Although the ESG trend is far from dead, I doubt it was ever really about being profitable…it makes more sense as a set of PR initiatives and feel-good public-private partnerships where neoliberal institutions, bureaucrats, and megacorporations can pat one another on the back for being “environmentally and socially-conscious.”

Either way, both JPMorgan and State Street recently left the Climate Action 100+ coalition, a major Wall Street ESG initiative, and BlackRock reduced its involvement. This effectively took almost $14 trillion in assets out of the ESG game. As the Financial Times reported earlier this month about BlackRock:

 “…it believes the phase 2 strategy, which takes effect in June, conflicted with US laws requiring money managers to act solely in clients’ long-term economic interest.”

After announcing it would become a pinnacle of ESG, BlackRock announced layoffs affecting 3% of its global workforce — many from ESG departments. In case that wasn’t enough to demonstrate the political toxicity of ESG initiatives, Fox Business even claimed last year that the acronym itself has become a dirty word at the company:

“Company founder and CEO Larry Fink told Fox Business he won’t use the mention of the letters E-S-G any longer because of the controversy it has stirred up in political circles.”

That’s a bit of hyperbole published for the sake of printing an exciting quote — BlackRock still has the most ESG assets under management of any firm, and has made more money than they’ve lost — but it’s still notable. The firm has still achieved net ESG inflows even as this month saw the worst flows ever industry-wide since ESG was birthed, with lower inflows in European markets and net negative flows in the US.

FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund Performance Since 2017

But if the backlash continues to spread and ESG advocates fail to paint the issue as regressive, anti-environmental right-wing meddling, those numbers could continue to dwindle. And if the growing farmer’s protests throughout Europe are any indication, grassroots backlash is growing like a brush fire against the “green bureaucracy” of EU mandates and initiatives like the UN’s Agenda 2030.

Above the ground level in Europe, ESG is not facing the same level of backlash from lawmakers as in the States. Ever-irascible and independent, the US has more momentum in Washington to push back on these initiatives compared to European states overseen by bureaucrats in Brussels. For now, ESG investing is still thriving in BlackRock’s European offices. But the farmer’s protests are saying a mouthful, and if the initiatives ultimately bleed money, that will be all that matters.

Some companies are actually reducing their European ESG commitments simply due to the regulatory environment in Brussels being rife with red tape. While the EU has put forth a plan to streamline its processes, ExxonMobil announced it could be withdrawing billions in European “climate investments” in favor of jurisdictions with more straightforward procedures and fewer regulatory roadblocks.

Meanwhile, the race to be the most “sustainable” and “ethical” company is pushing companies to make hollow “greenwashing” claims, leading to class actions and PR meltdowns. The notion of a global mega-corporation making money in an “environmentally friendly” way is itself more often than not a trendy contradiction for marketing purposes.

For example, there’s United Airlines, which now vaguely asserts they will be “100% green” and generate “net zero” emissions by 2050. That’s a bold claim for a company that, well, flies airplanes all over the world, and one that is now being challenged by civil litigation.

Meanwhile, Hershey is getting pushback on claims that some of its chocolate bars are “100% sustainable” — whatever that even means. These claims are usually slapped onto packages and stuffed into marketing materials without much, if any, further quantification. The civil suit filed in response to that claim states that Hershey still drives deforestation and uses child labor, and the “sustainable” label only applies to a percentage of its chocolate production. As more lawsuits stack up, Bloomberg Law’s Clara Hudson notes, ESG greenwashing could cost companies a boatload of money:

“73% of organizations say ESG disputes are the top litigation risk to them in 2024, according to a Backer McKenzie report that surveyed 600 senior lawyers at large corporations.”

As it stands now, a research firm called ESG Today found that around 70% of consumers are unwilling to spend more for “environmentally-friendly” products and green energy sources. Not surprising, as people are feeling increasingly squeezed by higher energy costs caused by “green” meddling, state intervention, and central bank money printing:

“… two-thirds of consumers report being unable to absorb an energy bill increase of 10%, and only 30% saying that they are confident that their energy will remain affordable.”  

With climate change doom and gloom at all-time highs, energy costs increasing for many around the world, and companies asking customers to pay more for less, it’s unlikely the pendulum will swing far enough the other way to move the needle toward anything resembling a full-throated global embrace of ESG. Either way, the battle will be epic.

Get Peter Schiff’s key gold headlines in your inbox every week – click here – for a free subscription to his exclusive weekly email updates.
Interested in learning how to buy gold and buy silver?
Call 1-888-GOLD-160 and speak with a Precious Metals Specialist today!

Related Posts

CPI vs Rate Cuts: The Fed’s Mission Impossible

With a hot CPI report casting a shadow of doubt on the likelihood of a June interest rate cut, all eyes are on the Fed. But they’ve caught themselves in a “damned if they do, damned if they don’t” moment for the economy — and the news for gold is good regardless. 


The Educational Gap in Economics

It’s no secret that the American public is wildly ignorant of many issues that are central to the success of our nation. Just a generation ago it would have been unthinkable that less than half of the American population could recognize all three branches of government. America is in most cases far less educated about its government […]


Central Banks Are Buying the Gold Top

In investing, “Buy low, sell high” is among the most well-known sayings, and generally, it’s good advice. But with gold still holding near its historic all-time highs, central banks led by China are bucking the classic adage and smash-buying more, buying the top to fortify themselves against a global monetary and financial blow-up.


The Passive Investor Problem

When John Bogle died in 2019, people around the world mourned. Bogle created the Vanguard Group and made the index fund mainstream. Index funds are investment vehicles that invest in a class of investments as a whole, rather than trying to predict what specific stocks or securities will do best. So an investor could invest in an […]


Student Loan Inflation, Here it Goes Again

As the Democratic Party has shifted away from its traditional base of working-class and middle-class Americans, to an increased reliance on college professors, students, and highly educated but low-paid professions, such as social workers, a new policy has risen to prominence: student loan forgiveness. 


Comments are closed.

Call Now