Contact us
CALL US NOW 1-888-GOLD-160
(1-888-465-3160)

Andrew Cuomo on Halloween – Far More Terrifying Than Michael Myers

  by    0   0

Peter Schmidt recently wrote two article highlighting the fatal conceit of PhD central planners who populate the world’s central banks. You can read those articles here and here. But central banking is not the only place you find people suffering from fatal conceit and the delusional notion that they are smart enough to micromanage the economy. You find a lot of these people in government offices as well.

For instance, consider New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Before he moved into the governor’s mansion in Albany, Cuomo helped orchestrate the 2008 housing crash. Schmidt highlights Cuomo’s role in that horror story in the following article.

The following was written by Peter Schmidt. Any views expressed are his own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Peter Schiff or SchiffGold. 

There are many examples of the complete dearth of creative talent in Hollywood. Perhaps the best example is Hollywood’s obvious reliance on movie “franchises” and characters developed decades ago. Just this past week, the number one movie at the box office was the latest iteration of the “Halloween” series of horror movies. These movies revolve around the terrifyingly enigmatic masked killer, Michael Myers. The first Halloween movie came out in 1978 – 40 years ago – and the creative “geniuses” in Hollywood still haven’t come up with a concept remotely as good. If they were smart – which they aren’t – Hollywood writers would have looked to the political arena and easily found someone far more terrifying than Michael Myers – NY Governor Andrew Cuomo.

Andrew Cuomo was Bill Clinton’s second housing secretary. (The Harvard educated Henry Cisneros was the first.) As will be described below, as housing secretary Andrew Cuomo pressed the self-destruct button on the US economy. He did so, by radically altering the mortgage lending standards used by the two enormous government-sponsored enterprises, (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Cuomo made it far easier to obtain mortgages from the GSEs. These lower lending standards then wreaked enormous economic havoc when so many of the mortgages issued under these new lending standards went bad.

In the chart below, homeownership rates in the US are tracked. (1) Bill Clinton claimed that one of the most important things he hoped to accomplish during his presidency was to increase homeownership to 67.5%. ( The rapid increase in homeownership coinciding with the start of President Clinton’s housing “strategy” in 1995 is clearly visible.) How Bill Clinton ever came up with the 67.5% homeownership goal is anyone’s guess. However, the fact that Bill Clinton came up with a homeownership goal – to three significant digits no less – is clearly the result of the enormous psychological defects that animate most career politicians.

 

The Clinton administration would move heaven and earth to achieve its goal of 67.5% homeownership. One of the most effective tools for achieving this goal – and thus helping to bring the United States to its knees – was the affordable housing (AH) mandate. The AH mandate was legislated into existence by the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of October 1992. This act required the GSEs to set a numerical goal for the percentage of mortgages that were issued to low and moderate-income borrowers. In October 1992, about 30-35% of GSE mortgages went to low and moderate-income borrowers. (2) At this level of lending to low and moderate income borrowers, lending standards were tight enough to keep default rates among GSE mortgages low.

Andrew Cuomo – who had no experience as a banker or in the mortgage industry generally – would cast these time-tested lending standards aside. On October 31, 2000, Andrew Cuomo declared that fully 50% of GSE mortgages must go to low and moderate-income borrowers. Michael Myers only wreaked havoc on the unsuspecting town of Haddonfield, Illinois; Andrew Cuomo would unleash economic havoc on every city and town in the United States.

Here is Andrew Cuomo – again, a total neophyte in the mortgage market – cavalierly casting aside decades of rule-based lending, and exposing his total ignorance of the enormous credit risks his policy was exposing the GSEs to;

“Even with a record homeownership rate of 67.7%, there is still much more to be done. These new regulations (requiring the GSEs to issue 50% of their mortgages to low and moderate income borrowers – author) will greatly enhance access to affordable housing for minorities, urban residents, new immigrants and others left behind, giving millions of families the opportunity to buy homes or to move into apartments with rents they can afford. We acknowledge and appreciate that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have accepted this challenge.” (3)

Recall that prior to the Clinton Administration, only about 30% of GSE mortgages went to low and moderate-income borrowers. By directing the GSEs to increase their lending to 50%, Cuomo was forcing the GSEs to increase their lending to low and moderate income borrowers by 67% of what it had been ( (50-30)/30)! Such a massive increase in lending could only be affected by a complete re-writing of lending standards. The only way to increase lending to low and moderate income borrowers by such a great extent was to make it far easier for low and moderate income borrowers to get loans. Of course, a direct consequence of this was the low default rates which had characterized pre-Clinton GSE lending, were left in the dust.

Some evidence of the huge default rates produced by Andrew Cuomo’s edict of October 31, 2000, can be seen by the events of September 05, 2008. On that day, Fannie and Freddie were effectively declared bankrupt – they were actually placed into something called “conservatorship” – and each received $100-billion in capital from Treasury to make good all their enormous losses. Later, on December 24, 2009 – a date obviously chosen to reduce public scrutiny – additional capital injections were authorized. In other words, the original $200-billion wasn’t enough!

The direct relationship between Andrew Cuomo’s ignorance as HUD secretary and the enormous GSE lending losses spawned by this ignorance has never been a topic for the mainstream media in this country. The fact that this relationship has not been discussed does not make this relationship any less valid. Andrew Cuomo – who will likely be among the leading candidates for President in 2020 – played an enormous role in the housing crisis, and his actions on Halloween 2000 prove this conclusively. By this standard, Andrew Cuomo’s actions on October 31, 2000, are far more terrifying than anything pulled off on Halloween by Michael Myers.

ENDNOTES

(1) The Housing Bubble and Financial Crisis as Central Planning by Government and the Promulgation of “Fake News” by Legacy Media – A Tale in Three Parts (August, 26, 2018)  http://www.the92ers.com/blog/housing-bubble-and-financial-crisis-central-planning-government-and-promulgation-fake-news

(2)  HUD Prepares to Set New Housing Goals, Table 1.  https://www.huduser.gov/periodicals/ushmc/summer98/summary-2.html

(3) HUD Announces New Regulations to Provide $2.4-trillion in Mortgages for Affordable Housing for 28.1-million Families  https://archives.hud.gov/news/2000/pr00-317.html

Peter Schmidt served six years in the Air Force and has spent the rest of his professional life in the petrochemical, oil refining and power generation industries. Peter has BS and MS degrees in mechanical engineering from Lehigh University and is a licensed professional engineer in California and Louisiana. Peter is finishing up his book, “Elites in Name Only – the Financial Crisis,” a comprehensive look at the people behind the 2008 financial crisis. He also runs the website the92ers.com, which provides an overview of the 50 people most responsible for causing the 2008 crash.

Get Peter Schiff’s latest gold market analysis – click here for a free subscription to his exclusive monthly Gold Videocast.
Interested in learning how to buy gold and buy silver?
Call 1-888-GOLD-160 and speak with a Precious Metals Specialist today!

Photo by Pat Arnow


Related Posts

Economy Rolling Over: Focus On Housing And Tariffs

house sitting on a pile of moneyAs the stock market was tanking last month, Peter Schiff said a recession is obviously coming. Now things have calmed down a little bit and everybody seems convinced October was just a bad month —  a needed correction. But as Peter has been saying, there are some fundamentals everybody is ignoring that look really bad. […]

READ MORE →

Savings – Not Tariffs – Will Make America Great Again

In a podcast earlier this month, Peter Schiff talked about the “twin deficits” of national debt and trade. We’ve talked a lot about the federal debt spiral, and there has even been some discussion about it in the mainstream. But almost nobody is paying attention to the growing trade deficit. Peter is an exception. When […]

READ MORE →

Fatal Conceit and the Question That’s Never Asked

Keynesian central planners suffer from what Peter Schmidt calls “fatal conceit.” Paul Krugman serves as the poster child for central planning arrogance. But it’s the Federal Reserve that gives the central planners power, as Schmidt highlighted in the first article in a series highlighting this fatal conceit. Schmidt built on this theme in the second article, […]

READ MORE →

The Gold Standard: Protector of Individual Liberty and Economic Prosperity

Most of the mainstream view the gold standard as an archaic relic from a bygone era. At best, a return to some kind of gold standard is unnecessary. At worst, it would plunge the world into economic chaos. Conventional wisdom holds that a gold standard would make boom-bust cycles worse. (This is a myth.) Paul […]

READ MORE →

The Story of Benjamin Strong: How Fatal Conceit Wrecks Economies

In an article we published last week, Peter Schmidt highlighted what he called the “fatal conceit” of modern Keynesian economics. These economists, central bankers and politicians think they can plan, direct and guide the economy through their great wisdom and application of their economic models. But as economist Friedrich Hayek explained, the central planners’ arrogance ignores […]

READ MORE →

Comments are closed.

Call Now