Contact us
CALL US NOW 1-888-GOLD-160

Andrew Cuomo on Halloween – Far More Terrifying Than Michael Myers

  by    0   0

Peter Schmidt recently wrote two article highlighting the fatal conceit of PhD central planners who populate the world’s central banks. You can read those articles here and here. But central banking is not the only place you find people suffering from fatal conceit and the delusional notion that they are smart enough to micromanage the economy. You find a lot of these people in government offices as well.

For instance, consider New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Before he moved into the governor’s mansion in Albany, Cuomo helped orchestrate the 2008 housing crash. Schmidt highlights Cuomo’s role in that horror story in the following article.

The following was written by Peter Schmidt. Any views expressed are his own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Peter Schiff or SchiffGold. 

There are many examples of the complete dearth of creative talent in Hollywood. Perhaps the best example is Hollywood’s obvious reliance on movie “franchises” and characters developed decades ago. Just this past week, the number one movie at the box office was the latest iteration of the “Halloween” series of horror movies. These movies revolve around the terrifyingly enigmatic masked killer, Michael Myers. The first Halloween movie came out in 1978 – 40 years ago – and the creative “geniuses” in Hollywood still haven’t come up with a concept remotely as good. If they were smart – which they aren’t – Hollywood writers would have looked to the political arena and easily found someone far more terrifying than Michael Myers – NY Governor Andrew Cuomo.

Andrew Cuomo was Bill Clinton’s second housing secretary. (The Harvard educated Henry Cisneros was the first.) As will be described below, as housing secretary Andrew Cuomo pressed the self-destruct button on the US economy. He did so, by radically altering the mortgage lending standards used by the two enormous government-sponsored enterprises, (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Cuomo made it far easier to obtain mortgages from the GSEs. These lower lending standards then wreaked enormous economic havoc when so many of the mortgages issued under these new lending standards went bad.

In the chart below, homeownership rates in the US are tracked. (1) Bill Clinton claimed that one of the most important things he hoped to accomplish during his presidency was to increase homeownership to 67.5%. ( The rapid increase in homeownership coinciding with the start of President Clinton’s housing “strategy” in 1995 is clearly visible.) How Bill Clinton ever came up with the 67.5% homeownership goal is anyone’s guess. However, the fact that Bill Clinton came up with a homeownership goal – to three significant digits no less – is clearly the result of the enormous psychological defects that animate most career politicians.


The Clinton administration would move heaven and earth to achieve its goal of 67.5% homeownership. One of the most effective tools for achieving this goal – and thus helping to bring the United States to its knees – was the affordable housing (AH) mandate. The AH mandate was legislated into existence by the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of October 1992. This act required the GSEs to set a numerical goal for the percentage of mortgages that were issued to low and moderate-income borrowers. In October 1992, about 30-35% of GSE mortgages went to low and moderate-income borrowers. (2) At this level of lending to low and moderate income borrowers, lending standards were tight enough to keep default rates among GSE mortgages low.

Andrew Cuomo – who had no experience as a banker or in the mortgage industry generally – would cast these time-tested lending standards aside. On October 31, 2000, Andrew Cuomo declared that fully 50% of GSE mortgages must go to low and moderate-income borrowers. Michael Myers only wreaked havoc on the unsuspecting town of Haddonfield, Illinois; Andrew Cuomo would unleash economic havoc on every city and town in the United States.

Here is Andrew Cuomo – again, a total neophyte in the mortgage market – cavalierly casting aside decades of rule-based lending, and exposing his total ignorance of the enormous credit risks his policy was exposing the GSEs to;

“Even with a record homeownership rate of 67.7%, there is still much more to be done. These new regulations (requiring the GSEs to issue 50% of their mortgages to low and moderate income borrowers – author) will greatly enhance access to affordable housing for minorities, urban residents, new immigrants and others left behind, giving millions of families the opportunity to buy homes or to move into apartments with rents they can afford. We acknowledge and appreciate that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have accepted this challenge.” (3)

Recall that prior to the Clinton Administration, only about 30% of GSE mortgages went to low and moderate-income borrowers. By directing the GSEs to increase their lending to 50%, Cuomo was forcing the GSEs to increase their lending to low and moderate income borrowers by 67% of what it had been ( (50-30)/30)! Such a massive increase in lending could only be affected by a complete re-writing of lending standards. The only way to increase lending to low and moderate income borrowers by such a great extent was to make it far easier for low and moderate income borrowers to get loans. Of course, a direct consequence of this was the low default rates which had characterized pre-Clinton GSE lending, were left in the dust.

Some evidence of the huge default rates produced by Andrew Cuomo’s edict of October 31, 2000, can be seen by the events of September 05, 2008. On that day, Fannie and Freddie were effectively declared bankrupt – they were actually placed into something called “conservatorship” – and each received $100-billion in capital from Treasury to make good all their enormous losses. Later, on December 24, 2009 – a date obviously chosen to reduce public scrutiny – additional capital injections were authorized. In other words, the original $200-billion wasn’t enough!

The direct relationship between Andrew Cuomo’s ignorance as HUD secretary and the enormous GSE lending losses spawned by this ignorance has never been a topic for the mainstream media in this country. The fact that this relationship has not been discussed does not make this relationship any less valid. Andrew Cuomo – who will likely be among the leading candidates for President in 2020 – played an enormous role in the housing crisis, and his actions on Halloween 2000 prove this conclusively. By this standard, Andrew Cuomo’s actions on October 31, 2000, are far more terrifying than anything pulled off on Halloween by Michael Myers.


(1) The Housing Bubble and Financial Crisis as Central Planning by Government and the Promulgation of “Fake News” by Legacy Media – A Tale in Three Parts (August, 26, 2018)

(2)  HUD Prepares to Set New Housing Goals, Table 1.

(3) HUD Announces New Regulations to Provide $2.4-trillion in Mortgages for Affordable Housing for 28.1-million Families

Peter Schmidt served six years in the Air Force and has spent the rest of his professional life in the petrochemical, oil refining and power generation industries. Peter has BS and MS degrees in mechanical engineering from Lehigh University and is a licensed professional engineer in California and Louisiana. Peter is finishing up his book, “Elites in Name Only – the Financial Crisis,” a comprehensive look at the people behind the 2008 financial crisis. He also runs the website, which provides an overview of the 50 people most responsible for causing the 2008 crash.

Get Peter Schiff’s most important Gold headlines once per week – click here – for a free subscription to his exclusive weekly email updates.
Interested in learning how to buy gold and buy silver?
Call 1-888-GOLD-160 and speak with a Precious Metals Specialist today!

Photo by Pat Arnow

Related Posts

US Foreign Policy, Oil and the Dollar

The war drums have quieted for the time being. But while the threat of a hot war seems to have diminished, economic warfare continues. President Trump announced another round of economic sanctions on Iran. We have written extensively how about how the US weaponizes the dollar and uses it as a foreign policy tool. This […]


The Ethical Case for a Gold Standard

As economist Thorsten Polleit pointed out, inflation has pernicious effects on the average person, while tremendously benefiting the chosen few. Inflation the money supply is a policy intentionally carried out by central bankers around the world. Polleit calls this an “inflation scam.” With the Federal Reserve signaling that it is willing to let the inflation […]


Inflation: A Wealth Redistribution Scam

The Fed has indicated that it won’t hesitate to let the inflation Jeanie out of the bottle. As Peter Schiff put it in a recent podcast, the central bank is willing to resurrect the inflation monster that former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker slew. Even if the Federal Reserve wasn’t set to allow inflation to run […]


Quantitative Easing By Any Other Name…

Stocks have pushed to record highs in recent weeks. If you read the headlines, you’d think it was all about optimism for a trade deal. Or maybe just some general bullishness on the US economy. But Peter Schiff has said that’s not the real reason stocks have continued to climb. In fact, there are a  lot […]


The Skyscrapers Are Warning Us!

Did you now skyscrapers can predict economic crashes? And the skyscraper index is flashing red. As economist Mark Thronton explained in his book, The Skyscraper Curse: And How Austrian Economists Predicted Every Major Economic Crisis of the Last Century, the so-called Skyscraper Index has a remarkably accurate record signaling economic downturns dating back to the late […]


Comments are closed.

Call Now