Contact us
CALL US NOW 1-888-GOLD-160
(1-888-465-3160)

Paul Krugman Proclaims “Gold Is Dead!” Says Even Bitcoin Has More Utility

  by    0   0

Paul Krugman said gold is dead. In fact, “Bitcoin has more utility than gold,” according to the popular lefty economist.

Krugman made the comments at ChainXChange, a blockchain artificial intelligence and innovation conference in Las Vegas.

To put this into perspective, you have to understand that Krugman is no fan of bitcoin. In a recent New York Times column, he explained why he’s a cryptocurrency skeptic.

“It comes down to two things: transaction costs and the absence of tethering.”

In a nutshell, Krugman believes cryptocurrency takes a step backward in monetary evolution because it “must be mined — created through resource-intensive computations.” In other words, it takes a lot of energy to create a bitcoin. On the other hand, central banks can create dollars out of thin air. In his view, this is a feature, not a flaw.

Krugman also doesn’t like bitcoin because it’s value isn’t “tethered to anything.” In other words, there is nothing underlying its value. And of course, dollars printed out of thin air have all kinds of value.

In this column, Krugman actually stumbles into a rare moment of honesty about the government fiat money system. One could easily argue that the dollar isn’t tethered to anything either. It has value because people have faith that it has value. But when you boil it all down, dollars are nothing more than pieces of paper and numbers in computers. But as Krugman points out, they are backed by the “full faith and credit” of the US government and we need dollars to pay taxes.

The value of a dollar doesn’t come entirely from self-fulfilling expectations: ultimately, it’s backstopped by the fact that the US government will accept dollars as payment of tax liabilities — liabilities it’s able to enforce because it’s a government. If you like, fiat currencies have underlying value because men with guns say they do. And this means that their value isn’t a bubble that can collapse if people lose faith.”

Tell that to the people of Venezuela.

The point here is that Krugman is no bitcoin apologist. He wrote, “cryptocurrency enthusiasts are effectively celebrating the use of cutting-edge technology to set the monetary system back 300 years.” So, when he says bitcoin has more utility than gold, he’s not talking up crypto, he’s dissing the yellow metal.

But Krugman painted himself into a corner, and I think he realizes it. The “lack of tethering” argument he makes against crypto in his NYT column applies equally to fiat dollars. Despite men with guns, the dollar’s value can still decline virtually zero. In fact, neither cryptocurrencies nor dollars have any utility beyond their usefulness as a medium of exchange or a store of value.

It’s unclear whether Krugman means bitcoin has more utility than gold simply in terms of its use as money, or if he’s talking in a broader sense. But there is no question that gold has far more actual real-world utility than either cryptocurrencies or government-backed fiat money. As a result, gold will always have a value floor below which it will not fall.

Gold’s value is certainly higher than it otherwise would be because of its role as money. But people use gold for many other things. They make it into jewelry. And they use it in industrial and technical applications. In fact, demand for gold in technology has grown for seven consecutive quarters. Over the past decade, the tech sector accounted for more than 380 tons of gold demand annually. That’s 13% ahead of central bank purchases during the same time period.

So, even if everybody completely quit using gold as money, it would still have substantial value. On the other hand, bitcoin and fiat dollars have absolutely no utility beyond their role as money.

That’s why Krugman felt the need to make this tethering argument for the dollar. In one sense he’s right. While bitcoin could theoretically fall to zero, as long as the US government requires us to pay taxes, the dollar will have some value above zero. But the dollar can certainly inflate to the point that it becomes essentially valueless.

Economist Robert Murphy does a good job of explaining this in a recent episode of the Contra Krugman podcast. As he explains, there is no floor on how weak the dollar can become in terms of purchasing power merely because the IRS insists on receiving dollars for its tax bills.

If by assumption, the dollar’s very weak, then that means you could sell one hour of your labor to get a trillion dollar bills. So, the fact that you need to hand over to the IRS a bunch of dollar bills, by itself does not tell me any information about the relative strength of the dollar. That’s consistent with the dollar being worth, you know, $1 gets you a loaf of bread or you need a quadrillion dollars to get a loaf of bread. That’s equally consistent with the fact that I have to pay my taxes in dollars.”

Again, we just have to look at countries like Venezuela and Turkey as they suffer through hyperinflation to see this truth. Government backing does not guarantee value. Gold will always have some value because it does have utility.

Krugman is a devoted disciple of government money. That shows through in this asinine statement that both fiat and bitcoin have more utility than gold. People have valued gold for thousands of years, both as money and for its other uses. That hasn’t changed. Gold’s not dead. And I have to say, putting your faith in an institution that has run up $21 trillion in debt just doesn’t seem like the wisest approach – even if its agents do have guns.

Bitcoin buy gold from SchiffGold

Get Peter Schiff’s most important Gold headlines once per week – click here – for a free subscription to his exclusive weekly email updates.
Interested in learning how to buy gold and buy silver?
Call 1-888-GOLD-160 and speak with a Precious Metals Specialist today!


Related Posts

India Monsoon Season Could Make Gold Demand Grow

Gold just wrapped up a strong quarter, up 13%, and finishing at the highest price level in over eight years. On the year, gold is up about 16% and many mainstream analysts are starting to eyeball record gold prices in the coming months. But there has been some drag on the gold market, particularly sluggish […]

READ MORE →

Who Is Buying All This US Government Debt?

The national debt pushed above $26 trillion last week. In just a little over two months, the US government has added over $2 trillion to the debt. The budget deficit has already set an all-time record with four months left in the fiscal year. In April, the US Treasury sold $1.287 trillion in additional US […]

READ MORE →

A Black Swan With Teeth

For years, I have been warning that during the age of permanent stimulus (which began in earnest with the Federal Reserve’s reaction to the dotcom crash of 2000), each successive economic contraction would have to be met with ever larger, increasingly ineffective, doses of monetary and fiscal stimulus to keep the economy from spiraling into […]

READ MORE →

Fed Chair Powell’s Solution Is the Root of the Problem

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell went negative in a webcast speech on Wednesday, May 13. I’m not talking about negative interest rates, although that could be coming down the pike as well. Powell went negative on the prospects of a quick economic recovery. He’s right about the prospects for the economy, but he’s wrong about the […]

READ MORE →

Are Negative Interest Rates in Our Future?

Are negative interest rates in our future? The markets are starting to think so. On Thursday, Fed fund futures contracts began pricing in negative interest rates. They were initially priced in for December but then shifted to early 2021. This doesn’t guarantee negative rates, but it does indicate markets are beginning to expect them.

READ MORE →

About The Author

Michael Maharrey is the managing editor of the SchiffGold blog, and the host of the Friday Gold Wrap Podcast and It's Your Dime interview series.
View all posts by

Comments are closed.

Call Now